How dirty is the World Cup in Qatar?

6 arenas specifically constructed for the World Cup, primarily fully air-conditioned. And yet the last round in qatar need to end up being the most sustainable world cup in history.

• Much of the emissions could have been avoided
• environment pledges of the organizers are big

The FIFA holds against it. Together with the Emirate, a 109-page sustainability technique was prepared, which promises a climate-neutral World Cup.

To compensate for tremendous C02 emissions, around one million trees were planted throughout the World Cup building work. Issue: Qatar, a peninsula surrounded by the overheated persian gulf, is among the most popular and driest areas of the world and for that reason the trees should be artificially irrigated. In the desert state, 10 energy-intensive seawater wages concern the operational and settlement impact.

And according to critics, the problem lies. The country is not the right thing for a World Cup, states Fischer. The infrastructure (stadiums, hotels, metro) had to be mainly produced, and the small Emirate generally counts on fossil fuels. The tournament is a prime example of Greenwashing, says Fischer, who speaks of an ecological life.

The tournament scores mostly with short distances, energy-efficient cooling and emission-low water and waste management. The organizers expect a total of 3.6 million lots of C02-95 percent of this caused by traffic and the building and construction of facilities.

This World Cup is certainly everything, however not eco-friendly, stressed Thomas Fischer from the German Ecological Help (DUH) in an interview with the SID. Due to the weather conditions and the building and construction of the infrastructure, it ought to rather expect it to be among the most entomological world championships of all time, says Fischer.

Much of the emissions could have been avoided

The smallest nation, which has each played a World Cup, also thought about ingenious services. A flagship residential or commercial property of the supposedly climate-neutral tournament is the arena 974 constructed from containers.

Avoidable emissions should be avoided. And just inevitable emissions must be compensated for. The reverse is the case here. A number of the emissions could have been avoided beforehand, states Fischer. The payment efforts are for that reason eye wiping.

The arena, which owes its name to the 974 ship containers and the global telephone code of Qatar, can be totally taken apart after the competition and rebuilt in other places. A later reuse and a modular building can make sense, says Fischer, but he adds that it would still be the most sensible to align a World Cup where the infrastructure is already offered.

environment pledges of the organizers are big

Nevertheless, the organizers' environment assures for the Grooves competition ought to be a yardstick for environmental duty in the area, the sustainability strategy says. What a yardstick this will be, FIFA and ecological professionals are various.

Philip Kramer, deputy chairman of the s committee of Bundles 90/Die Green, also strikes the exact same notch. The subject of environmental management need to currently take a high position in order to create acceptance among the population and to measure up to the social obligation, said Kramer, who badly doubts the environment neutrality of the competition.

6 stadiums specially developed for the World Cup, mostly fully air-conditioned. And yet the final round in Qatar ought to become the most sustainable world cup in history. The nation is not the right thing for a World Cup, states Fischer. To compensate for tremendous C02 emissions, around one million trees were planted during the World Cup building work. Problem: Qatar, a peninsula surrounded by the overheated persian gulf, is one of the most popular and driest locations of the world and for that reason the trees must be synthetically watered.